Art direction
One visual language across product, site and deck, so what a customer sees on Tuesday matches what they saw on Monday.
Hello. The name is
I art-direct and design for teams who already know what they are building, and need it to feel like one thing instead of forty.
Book a call
Two project slots open from September
Independent of the Year 2026
Art Direction & Interface
210+ launches behind me
Working across nine time zones
Shipped with 30+ product teams
Working together
Send me yours and I will tell you what I would do with it — honestly, and before there is any question of an invoice. If it is not a fit, I will name someone who is.
Send me the brief
Background
I spent my twenties inside agencies making things look expensive. Somewhere around the fourth rebrand that never shipped, I started asking what the work was actually for. These days I take fewer clients, ask the awkward questions in week one, and stay until the thing is live.
Engagements
One visual language across product, site and deck, so what a customer sees on Tuesday matches what they saw on Monday.
Screens with the awkward states drawn too — half-empty, mid-upload, wrong password, four hundred rows and counting.
Tokens, components and the written rules that stop the tenth screen drifting away from the first.
Marks, type and colour scoped for a team that has no design department to maintain any of it.
Fast, accessible front-end templates your marketing lead can edit without filing a ticket with engineering.
One week of full attention on a single funnel, flow or launch, ending in a written verdict you can act on.
How I work
Tools your team already has, files your team can open, and a handover that does not depend on me answering messages six months from now.
Selected work
The shape of it
The order is load-bearing. Each stage hands the next one something it cannot start without, which is how we avoid designing a screen for a decision nobody has made.
Two calls with you, four with your customers, plus every support ticket you are willing to share. I come back with the problem in one paragraph and you tell me where I got it wrong.
Week 1Structure, flows and the hard trade-offs on paper before anything gets styled. You sign off a skeleton, which costs far less to change than a finished screen.
Week 2Full-fidelity work with real copy and the ugly states included — loading, empty, error, name-far-too-long. Reviewed live, cameras on, every Thursday.
Weeks 3–5Component library, tokens, a written spec and a walkthrough with your engineers. A month of questions answered at no charge afterwards.
Week 6The shelf
Design Council annual, art direction category
WinnerFor the Petrichor reporting rebuild
FeatureUndergrove checkout, WCAG 2.2 AA audit passed
MeritRegional Brand Awards, shortlisted from 410 entries
FinalistTalk: designing the states nobody screenshots
TalkIn their words
We briefed three studios before this one. Robin spent the first week inside our support inbox rather than a design file, then showed us the two screens costing us signups. Setup completion moved forty-four points.
The handover is the part that surprised me. Our two engineers built the entire marketing site from the component library in eight days and never once had to send a message about it.
Fixed price, weekly demos, and in week two we were told to cut a feature rather than design it. That single conversation saved us a full quarter of engineering.
Notebook
Most teams design the full dashboard and bolt on a shrug for day one. Here is how to invert that order without slowing the build.
Call it brand-primary and you will be renaming four hundred references next year. A naming scheme that has survived three identity changes intact.
Scope creep starts in the first email, not the third month. These questions surface the real project, and occasionally end the conversation early.
FAQ
Send a paragraph about what is going wrong. If I am not right for it I will say so and name someone who is, usually the same day.
Write to meA full product engagement runs six weeks end to end. An identity is three to four. A second opinion is one week. If your deadline is tighter than that, say so early and you will get an honest answer about whether it fits.
Yes, wherever the scope is defined. One number, one payment schedule and a written list of what sits inside it. Anything outside becomes a conversation before work starts, never a surprise line on an invoice.
That is the normal arrangement. I join your stand-ups, write specs in whatever format your team already uses, and stay reachable for a month after handover so questions get answered rather than guessed at.
Source files, a component library with every state documented, a token sheet, exported assets and a written spec covering behaviour and edge cases. Build engagements also include the front-end templates and a configured theme.
Sometimes. A single landing page, a pricing rewrite or a one-week review all fit comfortably. Anything larger tends to work better as a short sprint than as hours scattered across a quarter.
You do, completely, once the final payment clears. Files transfer into your accounts rather than living in mine. I only ask permission to show the work publicly, and I will keep it private if you would rather.
Two project slots open from September
Tell me what is broken, who it is breaking for, and what happens if it stays that way. That is enough for me to come back with a scope and a number.